Tuesday, 6 August 2013

Up for an Update? Padden v Bevan Ashford rides again!


Diligent readers of the blog will remember me commenting on Padden v. Bevan Ashford Solicitors. You can quickly refresh your memory on the case revolving around the free half hour here:


You’ll never guess what’s back in the courts – 


That is correct, the re-trial of Padden v Bevan Ashford has taken place, and back to the Court of Appeal again! 

My gripe with the first Court of Appeal decision was that I considered that it just didn’t have regard to the realities of giving  a half hour free advice.  The course the Appeal Court said should have been followed just doesn’t reflect the realities of day to day life in the High Street.  Reading between the lines of the HHJ Vosper’s decision, which was under appeal, I have a feeling he had at least some sympathy with that view.  He couldn’t go behind the earlier decision of the Court of Appeal, that the newly qualified solicitor (now known to be a Ms. Shinner) had been deficient in her first meeting with Mrs. Padden, but at paragraph 16 we get a different flavour of that first meeting.

The judge notes that the claimant was “evidently distressed and in a rush to be back home as soon as possible”. So quite how much attention Mrs. Padden was giving to what Ms. Shinner had to tell her is doubtful.  Despite this, Ms Shinner took pity and decided to help. A human lawyer!  One who wanted to help a person in distress – not quite conforming to popular stereotype, one might say, but more common than is generally realised.
“Ms Shinner advised the claimant that she was not doing the right thing, and advised her not to sign any documents. Ms Shinner must have based that advice on her appreciation that paying off Mrs Partridge might not stop a criminal prosecution.” So the judge, upon looking with care at what happened at that first meeting realises that Ms. Shinner’s advice was focussed more closely on the key issue than perhaps the Court of Appeal first time round had realised.  If only Mrs. Padden had chosen to follow that advice!  Both she and her solicitors would have been so much better off.

The judge also said, “I find that Ms Shinner told the claimant that she was taking a huge or a big risk, and the risk to which Ms Shinner was referring was the risk that Mr Padden would face criminal charges despite the claimant's giving away her interest in the assets.” I guess this is as close to saying that she wasn’t so very negligent as a judge could reasonably get, given the earlier decision, and I commend this analysis.

Now what happened after Ms. Shinner ended her involvement was rather more of a problem, unfortunately.  A colleague wrote to confirm that “I am satisfied that this signatory understands the nature of this Deed and its meaning and effect and to the best of my knowledge has freely consented to it without undue influence or duress or in reliance upon misrepresentation.” (emphasis added).  It’s the italicised section which really seems problematic.  What’s more, he doesn’t seem to have made a note of that meeting, so he couldn’t remember what happened at it.  This was a very serious certification to have made and the lack of a record of that advice was critical.  The whole episode shows that routine certifications should not be readily available.  A solicitor has to spend serious time finding out what the whole transaction is about.  A serious charge should be made as there are serious consequences for the solicitor who gets it wrong – over £67,000 worth of consequences, actually!  Oh and the other thing?  Free advice?  So many of us now will just say no. 

Blog Disclaimer: Nothing in www.austinkempfamilylaw.blogspot.com blog should be construed as legal advice. If you require legal advice upon any family law related matter then you should instruct a solicitor. Any links to other blogs or web sites are provided for convenience only and Austin Kemp Solicitors cannot accept any responsibility for the contents of such linked blogs/sites.

13 comments:

  1. Whilst I have every sympathy with the solicitor concerned, one question keeps presenting itself in my mind: Why did she take it on?

    In order to to a job properly, time must be allocated and a client who cannot wait should be turned away.

    If I went to a restaurant and ordered fresh pork or chicken and demanded that it must be served to me in 5 minutes lest I miss my train home - the chef would refuse to fulfill the order on the grounds that s/he could not do the job properly and would probably poison me into the bargain.

    The same principle applies when a client disinstructs their solicitor the day/week before a trial starts. Woe betide the solicitor who agrees to take this on without having a good look at the file first (and vetting the potential client to ensure that they are not mad and have paid their previous solicitor's bills).

    Ms Shinner may well have been benevolent but for heaven's sake, don't work to the timescale set by the client unless the job can be done in that time and, getting back to the conclusion of the post, especially if you are doing it for free!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Family Law Solicitors and Family Law Liverpool, UK, providing expert legal advice relating to family Law.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the Information you shared and This case should be consider as a lesson.

    Regards
    Andrew Felix
    http://www.LawFirmsMarketing.com

    ReplyDelete
  4. influentialmediation for legal services & Family Law Mediation that will meet & exceed your expectations.click here: http://www.influentialmediation.com/

    ReplyDelete
  5. Offers practiced law inside Macon Region Illinois considering that frank byers decatur il began exercise regarding his pops inside the company Byers & Byers. The company afterwards evolved into known as Byers, Byers & Greenleaf.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In Texas, victims are designated two years to file a personal injury lawsuit from the date of the incident. Keep in mind the longer you wait, the more you lose. Memory tends to fade as time passes, making your testimony and those of witnesses less reliable. You also run the risk of losing important evidence due to accidental misplacement or discarding. File when the details are still fresh in your mind and when evidence is still in your possession. Your personal injury attorney requires every single piece of information available to you to design a potent legal strategy against the defense.
    Personal Injury Lawyer in Austin

    ReplyDelete
  7. Starting legal action Pro Se can seem like an intimidating process, but really, starting any legal action against anyone when representing yourself is not as scary as you may think. It is important to know that you can start the filings yourself, no matter what civil matter you are filing for. Whether it be a complaint for modification of a divorce decree, a petition for child custody, or reassessment of child court-ordered visitation, you can start the process yourself without the help of an attorney.suing home wrecker.

    ReplyDelete
  8. frank byers decatur ilFrank H Byers, II, has practiced law in Macon County Illinois since 1977. Frank started practice with his father in the firm Byers & Byers. The firm later became known as Byers, Byers & Greenleaf. After his father retired, Frank was a partner in the law firm Fuller, Hopp, McCarthy, Quigg & Byers before he began practicing law in the firm Frank H. Byers, II, Ltd., in 1995.

    Frank H. Byers, II, Ltd., is a full service litigation firm appearing in state and federal courts in Illinois. The firm represents both individuals and businesses in litigation in the trial and appellate courts. The firm represents clients in:

    Personal injury and wrongful death litigation as Plaintiffs and as Defendants
    Worker's Compensation claims for work injuries as Claimants and as Employers
    Discrimination litigation as Plaintiffs and as Defendants
    Social Security Disability applications
    Family law, custody, divorce, child support, spousal support and visitation litigation
    Will, trust and estate planning
    Probate litigation

    ReplyDelete
  9. Professionals in the career consulting industry rely on counseling, research, and marketing techniques to assist their clients in developing career options and industry alternatives that match their goals and objectives. http://www.ebay.co.uk/gds/SOLICITORS-FROM-TAYLOR-HAMPTON-SOLICITORS-LLP-/10000000178285021/g.html

    ReplyDelete
  10. Free Article Submission. Finally a way to keep track of all of the articles you have submitted. Article submission can be a daunting task when you are trying to do. One of the hardest things to do to promote your website is to build your link popularity. Article submission sites have become one of the best and most simple ways. Nice blog Primodels Review

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wow, at it again huh? Who do you think will come out on top from this case? I'm really curious how this lawyer dispute will turn out. I'm working with a case right now with my lawyers. What are some things to keep in mind to alleviate my stress about the outcome?
    Celine | http://www.bergermannlaw.com/familylaw.html

    ReplyDelete
  12. Excellent post - thanks for the information. I would really appreciate it if you can read my Accident Claims Hastings article and give feedback and reviews. Thanks once again for this outstanding post.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Family law issues are really complicated. That's why it's so important to have good lawyer. Not only can they interpret the myriad laws that come up in a case, they can ease your stress in dealing with a situation close to your hear. Sydney Criminal Lawyers

    ReplyDelete